![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjV5-byKV6NPkbjVr8nL_F5r2d-rOpC9FErC4d5Y1XndTEkcdB9rkePxz3MRfOSW9k6Op6bYV_OwwXeEwzLFW6cgJuUlhetv3lrljK_CxvC88JrDQY3CJqyJ8aY-kQp_gDsRcNWHibF3gMu/s1600/Co-op450W.jpg)
The original concept is one of a cooperatively owned food store. I was surprised to learn that food co-ops go back to 19th century England and the cooperative principles set by the Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers in Rochdale, England, in 1844.
The 4th Street Food Co-op is structured to allow for working and non-working members to get products at a discount - typically non-members can shop at a higher price. The motive is to be essentially a not-for-profit corporation.
I see two problems with the food co-op for this generation.
First, the food co-op is run by members and members are ideally to work there - most individuals these days have too many interests and other priorities to invest time in this manner for a small discount on food. People want convenience not more work and obligation. Non-working memberships are a way of dealing with this.
Secondly, I hate to be cynical, but i think that people's willingness to be politically correct and embrace causes does not include giving up most of the comforts we have become accustomed to. Scaling them back somewhat, but that's it. In regards to the food co-op, people want a much broader selection of goods in a boutique environment - see the rage that is Whole Foods Market, a wildfire spreading across the land. Higher prices, but they are not daunted - the checkout lines are huge. Everyone wants their Ipod and toys. All these manufactured goods have an environmental impact. We may give up the SUV, but not the car ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment